翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Nicholson Island (Pennsylvania) ・ Nicholson Museum ・ Nicholson Peak ・ Nicholson Peninsula ・ Nicholson railway station ・ Nicholson River ・ Nicholson River (Queensland) ・ Nicholson River (Victoria) ・ Nicholson River (Western Australia) ・ Nicholson Road ・ Nicholson Rock ・ Nicholson Street, Melbourne ・ Nicholson Township, Fayette County, Pennsylvania ・ Nicholson Township, Pennsylvania ・ Nicholson Township, Wyoming County, Pennsylvania ・ Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs ・ Nicholson War Memorial ・ Nicholson's Brewery ・ Nicholson's Obelisk ・ Nicholson, Georgia ・ Nicholson, Kentucky ・ Nicholson, Mississippi ・ Nicholson, Ontario ・ Nicholson, Ontario railway station ・ Nicholson, Pennsylvania ・ Nicholson, Victoria ・ Nicholson, Wisconsin ・ Nicholson-Rand House ・ Nicholson–Bailey model ・ Nicholstown Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs ： ウィキペディア英語版 Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs ''Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs'', () 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial". ==Background== Nicholson was employed for a period of 15 months by the regional police of Haldimand County when he was terminated without any reason given. The employer claimed that the ''Police Act'' allowed them to dismiss him at will, as he was still within an 18-month probationary period of employment. Nicholson, however, argued that he had a common law right to be treated fairly and be notified of the reasons for his termination. The issue before the Supreme Court of Canada was whether Nicholson's employers were entitled to terminate him without a hearing and without any reasons given. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.